Soooo.. 'Write a profile, nugget, write a profile!' quoth LinkedIn. And verily (wearily) I did.
I started with a cut/paste one from my Web Design and UX Portfolio... which somehow turned into a rant worth reading.
And so without further ado here we go!
While I've picked up a rather eclectic design skillset over the course of my career, including (but not limited to), web design, copywriting, packaging, animation, and front-end development, there's a single passion that unites all these things.
Improving people's lives by giving them kinder, saner tools.
Yup. Cliched. Corny as Hell. Still true.
I'm not talking world-shaking, changing-the-course-of-history improvements.
I'm talking small, everyday improvements. Improvements that make someone's day just a little bit better, preferably over an extended period of time. An easy, concrete example? Search with autocomplete. And there are so many, many more.
I believe that the tools we use should give us feelings of delight or mastery - or at very least, not make us feel like idiots. Kinder, saner software (because software is a product and a tool, as well as a service) isn't just good for customers, it's good for software companies too.
These kinder, saner tools are the ones that
...we vote for with our wallets.
...help us do things more quickly, more easily, more painlessly, and sometimes, even more enjoyably.
...allow us to go home after a hard day's work with the satisfaction of a job well done - and not the frustration of having spent a day fighting the very software that's supposed to help us.
And if, at the end of the day, I get to make these tools look sexy - that's a bonus. ;)
A wonderful, highly illegal map of the Interwebs, and here is the full mad scientist paper, aaaand some of the awesome images generated (available via the paper too).
Icons inside the applications themselves should be simpler and more graphic rather than realistic, like so:
Update:
BLAH! So it turns out WPF can't easily handle raster images, so the in-application icons cannot be the style shown above. The style shown above requires pixel art...which is, by nature, raster.
I also tried redoing a raster in pixel style (eg. 1x1px squares...) but that still doesn't look good, and apparently takes quite a bit of processing power to render.
Vector vs Raster Icons at Small Sizes (original file cabinet icon)
Pixel Art Requires a New Level of Abstraction
This is something that doesn't seem to have been covered in the comments, that anyone who does pixel art at the tiny sizes it's ideally suited to knows.
Guess I'll Make 'Em Fancy Vectors
Sooo... in-app icons will have to be fancy and realistic too. Oh well, at least there aren't many of them. At least, I'm planning them not to be. Not too fond of icons inside applications that scream LOOK AT MEEEEEE.
Here's a LOOOKATMEEEE icons so far. ._.
I've posted something similar before, but where the other one was elegant, this is quirky. Both are wonderfully crafted, and I think it's beautiful, needed work - changing a source of potential social awkwardness to a unique and lovely talking point and source of pride.
Can't help wondering what it would have been like if scoliosis braces like this had been available in my day.
(Just to be clear, that is their default hint text - I didn't type it.)